Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
A view of the California State Capitol. The budget outlook is improving for the Golden State, but that doesn't mean there will soon be a lot of money on the bank.
California may declare a surplus for its fiscal year 2014 budget. Unfortunately, the state won’t be able to put money in the bank for a rainy day.
That doesn't mean its outlook isn't looking up. The credit rating agency Moody’s likes what it sees in the Golden State's improved fiscal situation. In particular, the passage of Prop 30 last November — raising incomes taxes on wealthy Californians and sales taxes on everybody — bodes well for future revenues.
But getting the budget out of deficit and into surplus doesn’t mean the state will be prepared for the next inevitable economic bust.
Moody’s analyst Emily Raimes blames a history of underfunding education.
“As revenues increase in the state in the next few years, additional revenues will have to be dedicated to bringing that education funding back to the baseline where it would have been if the state had not been doing that underfunding," she said.
Don't get too excited. Mars Curiosity has been a big success, but there might not be much money for missions in the future.
We successfully landed a one-ton nuclear-powered robot car on a planet over 300 million miles away, using a rocket skycrane. Now Mars Curiosity has, in just a few weeks, beamed panoramic pictures of its new red world back to Earth, zapped a rock with a laser, wiggled its wheels as a precursor to its first spin on the Martian surface, and then gone for a plutonium-powered drive.
Everything is going great!
Except that back home, it isn't. They were high-fiving in their powder-blue polo shirts at Jet Propulsion Lab mission control in Pasadena, when Curiosity signaled that it had not become a $2.5-billion flame out or a smoldering hole in Gale Crater. But the future of "planetary science," with a focus on Mars, is in doubt, as science takes a back seat in NASA's budget.
Will public opinion infuence NASA's budget?
Photo by Chris Radcliff via Flickr Creative Commons
At UCLA, the MBA program will no longer be supported by funds from the State of California.
The UCLA Academic Senate approved a plan today to shift the Anderson School of Management's daytime MBA program to a self-funded model. Anderson's MBA program has been around since 1939 and has always been state-funded. But now it will be supported only by tuition and donations, according to UCLA.
The total savings will be $8.8 million, which would be diverted to other programs at UCLA, making up for budget cuts brought on by the ongoing fiscal crisis in state-supported higher education in California.
UCLA Anderson is generally considered an elite, top-20 business school, as ranked by publications such as Forbes and U.S. News & World Report. Tuition is currently over $45,000 per year for California residents and over $52,000 per year for out-of-state students studying full-time.
The vote in the UCLA Academic Senate was 53-46 in favor of the move, with three abstentions. The proposal now goes to the full University of California Academic Senate and UC President Mark Yudof for a final vote.
The LA Zoo's Elephants of Asia Exhibit opened this past December. If the Zoo were privatized, it would save the city almost $18 million per year.
I've been digging through Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's budget proposal for Los Angeles' fiscal 2012-13. The bottom line is that the Mayor, through cuts and revenue enhancements, plans to eliminate a $200-million-plus deficit in a total budget of $7.2 billion.
When you ponder the numbers, it's the very large ones that jump out at you:
• A police department that costs $1.3 billion to fund and consumes $449 million in pension payments, which when totaled account for nearly a quarter of the entire budget
• A City Attorney's office that costs nearly $100 million
• A city zoo that gobbles up almost $18 million per year
Okay, so that last number isn't all that huge. However, within the context of the budget deficit — $238 million — the zoo represents almost 8 percent. (And it's not even the total cost to operate the zoo, which is about $26 million annually.) You don't have to be an investment genius to recognize that figuring out a way to unload that cost would yield the city a decent return and reduce the need to, say, lay off clerks in the LAPD, something that Chief Charlie Beck has said will require the department to change the way it handles some of its business.
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has budget issues.
There's a general sense of hysteria — including the use of the "b" world (bankruptcy) — over Los Angeles' estimated $222-million budget deficit. Everyone seems very, very worried. The future looks even more grim, as the deficit is expected to rise to $427 million by 2014-15. There's abundant hang-wringing going on. But is $222 million really that big a deal?
The overall budget is about $7 billion. The deficit is less than 3 percent of that total. For comparison, New York City is running a deficit on a $70-billion budget that's more than double that of L.A. — and the Big Apple is delighted that it can reduce that to L.A. levels.
Miguel Santana, the Chief Administrative Officer, actually has a plan to close most of L.A.'s budget gap. This is from the L.A. Times:
Santana says about $150 million in new revenue is needed. Doubling the so-called documentary transfer tax imposed on the sale of property could bring an additional $100 million, he said. Raising the parking tax by 10% to 15% would bring in $40 million. Additional revenue could come from improved collection of parking ticket fees and ambulance billing, he said.