Photo by Robert Garcia via Flickr Creative Commons
The City of Malibu announced this week that the $50 million Legacy Park Project has earned the Water Quality Improvement Award from the Water Environment Federation. It’s the seventh major award that Legacy Park has earned over the past year, including Project of the Year from the American Society of Civil Engineers.
“We thank the Water Environment Federation for recognizing our commitment to environmental stewardship and education,” said Malibu Mayor Laura Rosenthal in a press release. “The creation of Legacy Park is one of the many ways the City has proven its dedication to helping create a cleaner environment and to protecting the health of our nearly 13,000 residents and approximately 15 million annual visitors who enjoy Malibu beaches.”
Legacy Park is an “environmental cleaning machine,” which captures and disinfects storm-water and urban runoff for treatment and disinfection, and using it to offset potable water usage.
Malibu Lagoon State Beach is the site of a tug-of-war among environmentalists with different priorities for wetlands protection.
Malibu firefighter Stephenie Glas co-founded "The Real Malibu 411" as a web presence to promote what she saw as the true story about the restoration of Malibu Lagoon. Her site links to agency plans, court decisions, hearing transcripts, and other technical information directly; she backed restoration of the lagoon. A few days before she died from what was apparently a self-inflicted gunshot, she told me that for people who didn't support the project, or wanted to find out more, she wanted to be a resource. Her friend Cece Stein, a Malibu-based publicist, co-founded the site. Now she's doing informational videos about the restoration as it's happening.
This week Stein interviewed Suzanne Goode from California State Parks & Mark Abramson from the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission.
Save Malibu Lagoon posted this picture; Marcia Hanscom wrote that it is "not restoration." So far, state agencies disagree.
Opponents to the Santa Monica Bay Restoration-led Malibu Lagoon restoration project have been circulating allegations that the work is illegal. The letter hand-delivered to the California Coastal Commission complains about incomplete and unapproved public access and dewatering plans and other problems that, they allege, would force the SMBRC to stop the project temporarily for a public hearing, or even permanently. Here's the letter. Letter from WDF and CLEAN alleging illegal activity at Malibu Lagoon
CLEAN and the Wetlands Defense Fund say in their letter that the coastal commission "takes great pains" in approving projects and requiring them to comply with state and federal laws. The coastal commission's investigator Patrick Veesart writes, in response that "every effort is being made by the applicant" to comply with the law. California Coastal Commision response to allegations about Malibu Lagoon
Marcia Hanscom/Wetlands Defense Fund
A view of Malibu Lagoon in July 2011.
As I’ve been talking to adversaries about Malibu Lagoon in the last week, what stands out is how well they know each other. Or, at least, how well they think they do.
“That’s a fundamental difference in how people are looking at that site,” Rich Ambrose of UCLA told me. “People who understand that there are a lot of problems and the site is impaired, but it’s on the water side, versus the people who enjoy going out to the site and they can see plants living on the ground and they can see the birds that are using it and so they don’t, I think, understand what the problems with the site are.”
Environmentalism isn’t a single viewpoint. The environmental priorities of the proponents of the Malibu Lagoon restoration are on display and have been, pretty much by law, for more than a decade. They say the project aims to decrease urban runoff, increase circulation, restore habitat, and decrease nutrients in the water.
Courtesy The Real Malibu 411/Steve Woods
A view of the Malibu Lagoon after a 1938 flood.
Earlier we looked at who the opponents to the Malibu Lagoon restoration project are, and what their general grievances are. Now let’s meet the project’s backers.
The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission is the lead agency running lagoon restoration. It’s an independent state agency, funded in part by a nonprofit foundation. Members of the commission are appointed from local government and environmental groups.
The lagoon sits on land managed by the California State Parks system. One interesting thing is that the state parks website seems to show awareness of the fact that there is opposition: it lists the mainstream environmental groups and people that back it.
Commission staffers, the people who work there, are scientists and, in the most neutral sense of the word, bureaucrats. What I mean by that word is that they believe in the process. And over a period of several years, they say, they’ve gone through a lengthy one. Along the way, the public has participated, and regulators and scientists have cast scrutiny on the plans.