Environmentalists are celebrating the defeat of Prop 23, which would have suspended California’s landmark global warming law, AB 23. Reports LA Times: “Proposition 23 failed by a stunning 61% to 39%, giving heart to national environmental leaders and signaling the advent of new players in eco-politics: high-tech entrepreneurs, mainly based in Silicon Valley, who see clean energy as an economic investment.”
At Salon’s How the World Works blog, Andrew Leonard opines that the defeat of Prop 23 “affirms the California dream” — with repercussions far beyond the Golden state. “California’s economy is so large that the state can, by itself, make a huge, globally relevant impact on the development of clean and renewable energy technology.” NY Times delves into the fight behind Prop 23, dissecting the strategies that went into defeating the dirty energy proposition.
We’ll have more coverage of what Tuesday’s elections meant for the environment later today. For now, the latest in other news:
L.A.’s cycling community isn’t happy with L.A.’s proposed Bicycle Plan. According to LAist, “Much of the disagreement with the plan comes down to three points: a commitment to bike lanes, defining bicycle friendly streets, and updating the Technical Design Manual.” Upset cyclists are urging the Planning Commission to reject the plan at its meeting today, sending it back for a major redraft.
Why is it so important to get LA Beyond Coal? Find out at a Community Cinema Screening of Deep Down, a documentary that follows Beverly May and Terry Ratliff, who grew up on opposite sides of a mountain ridge in Kentucky, who find themselves on the opposite sides of the debate when a mountaintop removal coal mine affects their community’s economy, environment, and health. The screening happens Nov. 8 at 8 pm at The Actors’ Gang at The Ivy Substation, 9070 Venice Blvd., Culver City. RSVP on the Axis Mundi website. Cost: Pay what you can at the door.
San Francisco bans Happy Meals. More specifically, the city’s forbidding restaurants to give out free toys with meals that don’t meet certain nutritional guidelines. “Under the ordinance, scheduled to take effect in December 2011, restaurants may include a toy with a meal if the food and drink combined contain fewer than 600 calories, and if less than 35% of the calories come from fat,” LA Times reports.
Health testing of California beaches has been extended for a year, reports LA Now. “The State Water Board voted Tuesday to spend $984,000 in state bond money to continue testing for bacteria at hundreds of beaches through 2011.”
In national news: States and enviro groups support the U.S. EPA’s climate program. NY Times reports “a coalition of 20 states and 13 environmental groups has pledged its support for the agency” and its plans “to begin regulating greenhouse gases from large power plants, factories and other major emissions sources” starting Jan. 2.
Backers of a measure aimed at securing funding for state parks blaimed a noisy and cluttered election for the fact that Proposition 21 didn't attract enough voters. The measure would have tacked an $18 charge onto vehicle registrations, in exchange for which California-registered cars would have gotten free admission to state parks and beaches. The idea was to create a dedicated funding stream for parks whose maintenance has been deferred for decades. Opponents called the proposal a "car tax" and said it was "ballot box budgeting at its worst."
Mike Sweeney, executive director of the Nature Conservancy, said, "Ongoing economic challenges and a confusing and contentious overall election environment made it difficult to connect with voters about the importance of funding conservation in California."
Environmental groups gathered at Global Green USA headquarters in Santa Monica patted themselves on the back - in some cases, literally - for creating a coalition of environmental and business interests that together seem to have brought defeat to Proposition 23.
Early after the polls closed, in the main room at Global Green USA, on a big screen, Ron Johnson raised his hands in victory - the next U.S. Senator, elected over incumbent Russ Feingold in Wisconsin.
The difference is striking. In Wisconsin, they've elected a guy who doesn't seem to believe that climate change, man-made or not, is real:
In California, proponents of Proposition 23 went to some trouble to avoid calling climate change into question. Instead they pitched the measure as a manufacturing and job-saver.
I'll post comments on the results from environmental groups and venture capitalists as I receive them.