Some 140-thousand Fresno voters got the wrong language for a ballot measure that would pause the state's landmark greenhouse gas law - and the Yes campaign ain't happy.
As Proposition 23 came to the ballot, a federal judge altered its language at the insistence (legally speaking, we call it a "civil suit") of Yes on 23 folks. References to "major polluters" were changed to "sources of emissions" - that's the big one (and confusing in and of itself, since the Supreme Court declared greenhouse gases pollutants under the Clean Air Act a few years back) - and “suspends air pollution control laws” was changed to "suspends implementation of air pollution control law [AB 32]."
Except Fresno seems to have had a slight printing problem, and published the "polluters" version.
The yes campaign is getting word out to its supporters and anyone on its communications lists with text messages.
Love bats? Want to dress up as one for Halloween? Then get that broken black umbrella out of your closet and go green by creating your own batty upcycled costume — for a Halloween Masked Ball that benefits Bat Conservation International.
I’ll be honest — I am very scared of bats. In fact, back when I lived in the Miracle Mile area about a decade ago, I woke up one scary morning to see a clumsy bat flapping around my ceiling! Of course I hid under the covers until the bat disappeared through some exit route I couldn’t determine — at which point I called the CDC — then got a full round of rabies shots!
No actual bats will be at the Halloween Masked Ball, however. And while I hope bats never visit me in my home again, I also hope they don’t go extinct. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service (PDF), seven of the 45 kinds of bats living in the U.S. are in danger of becoming extinct — including the lesser long-nosed bat found in California.
Bat Conservation International works on bat conservation efforts, and a $10 donation to the nonprofit gets you into the Halloween Masked Ball. G2 Gallery says there will be “spine-chilling foods and drinks” — a.k.a. margaritas and tapas — as well as “hair-raising music, and blood-curdling costumes.”
Dress up, because the best costumed reveler will win a nature and wildlife photograph by Michael Forsberg. It all happens tomorrow, Oct. 30, from 7 pm to 9 pm at G2 Gallery, 1503 Abbot Kinney Blvd., Venice. Make sure you RSVP to email@example.com.
Photo by Lenore Edman/Flickr
Bacteria already in the ground could clean drinking water in the Inland Empire. According to Janet Zimmerman at the Press-Enterprise, water districts are developing system whereby water is pulled from well, run past these bacteria, which eat perchlorate and nitrate and VOCs, volatile organic compounds (well, digest them), producing nitrogen gas which can get released to the atmosphere with oxygen. Then they zap out the waste bacteria, chlorinate the mess and bam! Drinking water.
Though biological treatment is more expensive up front, about $4.2 million vs. $3.8 million for ion exchange, it saves money in the long run because it can treat high levels of contaminants and treats multiple chemicals in a single process. Biological treatment is about $238 per acre-foot of water, compared to $254 for ion exchange, according to a 2009 study by the Department of Defense.
Governor Schwarzenegger and James Cameron launched a PSA against Prop 23, reports Grist. The Avatar director recently contributed $1 million to fight Prop 23.
The Westside Subway Extension will run down Wilshire Blvd. to Westwood, decided the Metro board yesterday. “If all goes as planned, construction will begin in 2013 after an environmental impact review,” reports LA Times. When will it be finished? Depending on various funding scenarios, sometime between 2022 to 2036, according to Metro’s The Source.
The Metro Board also decided that the downtown Regional Connector will be fully underground. “The 1.9-mile connector would proceed underground via 2nd Street and beneath 1st and Alameda streets. It would include three stations, at 2nd and Hope streets, 2nd and Broadway, and 2nd and Central Avenue,” reports LA Times. That project’s expected to be operational by 2035.
I'm interested in the completion of the Marine Protected Areas process - under the state's MLPA law - so I've been reading up on that lately. Here in Southern California, we've got protected areas proposed and under final consideration at the state's Fish and Game Commission. Further up the coast - the North Coast region is still hashing out where protections might go. It's kind of interesting to check in on their process.
As in southern California, the negotiated process has achieved a measure of local consensus. Trouble is, according to a report a few days ago in the Eureka Times-Standard, state biologists aren't impressed with what they've come up with:
The proposal has unachievable goals, scientific shortcomings and unenforceable provisions, Fish and Game marine biologist Rebecca Studebaker said, and the 17 marine protected areas won't meet the requirements of state law without substantial changes.
It was the first showing of the state's position on the proposal developed by more than two dozen fishermen, environmentalists, tribes and seafood gatherers over months of meetings and work. The proposal has been nearly universally supportedlocally, despite the expected economic and social effects of the Marine Life Protection Act.
”These are unable to fulfill the intended purpose of the MLPA,” Studebaker said.