Multi-American | How immigrants are redefining 'American' in Southern California

Some good reads as State Question 755 winds its way through court



Photo by Il Primo Uomo/Flickr (Creative Commons)


A temporary restraining order will continue in effect until the end of this month blocking a controversial new Oklahoma law that, if implemented, would amend the state's constitution to ban the use of Islamic Sharia law in the state's courts. United Press International reported that in a hearing today, a federal judge in Oklahoma City extended an order blocking implementation of what was known on the ballot as State Question 755, approved by voters in the Nov. 2 election.

The ballot initiative was approved by an overwhelming majority - 70 percent - even though there is no known instance of Islamic law ever being cited in Oklahoma courts.

Two days after the ballot measure was approved, the director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations filed suit to stop its implementation on constitutional grounds. Today the restraining order was extended until Nov. 29, when a ruling is expected on whether the law violates the U.S. constitution.

So what to make of this complicated case unfolding halfway across the country, and what broader implications does it have beyond the Sooner State, for Muslims and non-Muslims? There have been some interesting reads lately regarding State Question 755, the questions it raises, the conversations surrounding it, and the political implications it carries.

Here are a few:


The outcome of the State Question 755 case, much like that of the federal legal challenge against Arizona's SB 1070, will be closely watched to see what legal precedent it sets. But the political precedent, at least, has already been set: The Los Angeles Times and other outlets have reported that similar laws are already being considered in others states.