Photo courtesy of CAIR-LA
Intern Noor Abdallah in modified Disney uniform
In his column yesterday, the Los Angeles Times' Michael Hiltzik wrote about the issue again with some interesting perspective on Disney: Given the company's massive influence on entertainment and mainstream culture in general, could its actions help pave the way toward the mainstreaming of Muslim culture and standards of dress?
As an example of Disney's cultural evolution, Hiltzik cited in his column Disneyland's one-time ban on same-sex dancing, which in 1984 led to the eviction of two gay men from the park. The company lifted the ban the next year following a court challenge.
Screen shot of interactive map showing percentage of Latino registered voters (Source: Pew Hispanic Center)
Moving the cursor over each state brings up details, including how many Latino voters there are and what percentage of the overall electorate they make up. California ranks first, with close to 5.4 million eligible Latino voters based on the available data, which was taken from the 2008 American Community Survey.
The center recently released the results of a survey on Latino voter attitudes, which showed strong support for Democratic candidates but weak voter motivation.
Soul-searching in Shenandoah - Opinion - The Times-Tribune On the conviction last week of two young Pennsylvania men for the hate-crime beating death of undocumented immigrant Luis Ramirez in 2008.
Smuggler who used Lynwood 'drop house' can get 10 years - Long Beach Press-Telegram When a search warrant was served on the Lynwood house, 37 undocumented immigrants were found inside.
EPA's "environmental justice" tour comes to California - Los Angeles Times New EPA chief Lisa Jackson: “Too often it's the poor and minority communities who have little voice in environmental decisions, but live in the shadow of the worst pollution."
Disney should lead the way on acceptance of Muslim clothing and customs - Los Angeles Times An interesting take on Disney and the two female Muslim employees who have pressed the company on their right to wear hijab at work.
Photo by Leslie Berestein Rojas/Flickr (Creative Commons)
What a supermarket snack aisle looks like in a town that is more than 90 percent Latino, September 2010
And no, this photo has nothing to do with Bell's political corruption scandal, even if that's what I was writing about when I took it.
Just enjoy the chicharrones and Charritos.
Photo by stay sick/Flickr (Creative Commons)
Graffiti in Munich, Germany, Feb. 2008
The debate this week over using the term "illegals" to refer to immigrants who have entered the country or overstayed their visas illegally continues. And reading the comments beneath a series of posts on ColorLines, The American Prospect, The Washington Post and other sites has been fascinating, a bit like being a fly on the wall at a gathering where a heated debate is taking place among the guests.
Yesterday, I linked to a first-person essay by Rinku Sen, publisher of the online magazine ColorLines, titled “Why I Don’t Use the I-Word – in ANY Form.” ColorLines, which covers communities of color and often takes on the issue of race, has launched a campaign called “Drop the I-Word,” urging media outlets not to use the word “illegals” in reference to undocumented immigrants.
Over the years I've been witness to many a newsroom conversation over what to call people who are in the country illegally. There is illegal immigration, yes, but what to call the immigrants themselves? In general, mainstream media outlets tend to go with AP style, which is “illegal immigrants.” The terms “undocumented” and “unauthorized” are also used, if less commonly. Is "illegals" a term that is used disparagingly? Yes, but then what about "illegal immigrants?" An act can be illegal, but can a person be referred to as such? It's an old conversation, but one that is refreshing to see again as part of a nuanced public discussion.