Last week, when college students invested in the Dream Act gathered around the country to anxiously watch the results of voting in the House and Senate, one of those on the edge of his seat was Arthur Mkoyan. The Armenian-American former high school valedictorian from Fresno made national headlines two summers ago when, as he prepared to graduate, he and his parents were arrested by immigration authorities. A deportation date was set for shortly after his graduation.
In June 2008, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced a private bill that granted them a temporary reprieve. Mkoyan is now 20 and in college. But his immigration status remains in limbo, since private bills rarely succeed. The family arrived on temporary visas when he was four years old. Mkoyan's father, a government worker in his native country, felt threatened after exposing corruption where he worked, and they applied for asylum. But the application was denied several years ago. Without further intervention, Mkoyan and his parents could again find themselves in deportation proceedings in the future.
King Outlines Immigration Plans for 2011 - New York Times Rep. Steve King of Iowa, the Republican who is expected to lead the main subcommittee on immigration in the House of Representatives next year, promises to crack down on employers, among other things.
Daniel Altschuler: Key Questions as DREAM Debate Heats Up - Huffington Post For starters, does the legislation even have a chance? These and other questions surrounding the Dream Act, which would grant conditional legal status to undocumented youths who attend college or join the military.
Lawmakers Engage in Lengthy “Twitter-busters” on DREAM Act, Tax Cuts - Fox News More on the "tweet war" involving Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of Orange County vs. Dream Act supporters.
Photo by Leslie Berestein Rojas/KPCC
A street sign near the city's harbor is a reminder of a long-ago immigrant past, November 2010
The city that I called home for several years is best known as a border town, but its lesser-known immigrant history also takes in two thriving Portugese-speaking communities.
The harbor-area San Diego neighborhood of Point Loma attracted Portuguese immigrants to its tuna-fishing industry in the early part of the last century, and their influence remains visible today. So does their language, which has helped make the city a comfortable landing spot for more recent immigrants from Brazil.
Why mention this? The house I lived in is just a few blocks from Avenida de Portugal. It's a tiny street in Point Loma that is still home to a Portuguese community center and chapel. I walked past this little cultural outpost often, most recently while in town packing to relocate my household to Los Angeles. I'll miss it, as I'll miss many things, now that the moving truck is en route up I-5.
Source: Visa Bulletin for November 2010, U.S. Department of State
Nations with current longest waits for family-sponsored based immigrant visas: The priority dates shown are when applicants now up for processing filed their petitions.
It's well into December, which means it's time to post the longest current waits as listed in the U.S. State Department’s monthly Visa Bulletin.
Immigrant visas have technically become available for those whose priority dates, i.e. the dates on which their petitions were filed, are listed in the bulletin. And this month, the hopeful immigrants who have been waiting the longest to come legally have been in line since the beginning of 1988. That's right, their petitions were filed in the eighties.
As listed in this month’s Visa Bulletin, the longest waits have been endured by:
1) Brothers and sisters of adult U.S. citizens from the Philippines, a wait of nearly 23 years (petitions filed January 1, 1988).
2) Unmarried adult (21 and over) sons and daughters of U.S. legal permanent residents from Mexico, a wait of more than 18 years (petitions filed June 22, 1992)
So just what was it that happened with the Dream Act last week? A victory in the House on Wednesday, a Senate move to table the bill on Thursday, and media reports since that have ranged from declaring the bill dead to its having a better chance now than before.
For those still shaking their heads, The Hill has the best blow-by-blow analysis I've seen yet of what is referred to in the piece as a "carefully designed strategy" orchestrated between both chambers of Congress to give the measure its best possible shot. From the piece:
The fast-evolving process required behind-the-scenes scheduling changes; an eleventh-hour hearing; constant lobbying from supporters; and a risky-but-successful show of procedural gymnastics in the Senate — all aimed at lending momentum to the hot-button bill in hopes of enacting it by month's end.
In short, supporters say, the process has infused life into the policy.