When I graduated from college nearly two years ago I couldn't have imagined that one day I'd be working as a Web producer, much less at a radio station. I simply wanted to write.
While that desire still exists within me, the landscape of the news media has changed quite dramatically during my foray into the industry. So while I scramble to keep abreast of how technical advancements are driving the way news is broadcast and published, there's also not much comfort in knowing many editors, producers and publishers are playing catch-up, too.
Another proposed solution comes from the two co-authors of a recently released book, "The Death and Life of American Journalism."
People were taken aback by President Obama's question and answer session with House Republicans last Friday. It was a serious discussion of the issues facing the nation, carried live on several cable networks, which seemed to go beyond what we usually see in public politics. You can view the 20 minute address by Obama and the hour of Q & A that followed here:
Obama took questions from members of his own party this week in a public session with Senate Democrats:
A group has come together demanding that something like the House Republican question and answer session become a regular thing. Demand Question Time, a group describing themselves as "an ad-hoc cross-partisan group of activists, writers, bloggers, journalists, technologists, philanthropists and politicos," has set up a Web site with a petition stating their demand, as well as a list of high profile supporters. The group's steering committee ranges from blogger Glenn "Instapundit" Reynolds on the right to Mother Jones' David Corn.
• Having 10 nominees for Best Picture takes away a bit of the meaning of being a Best Picture nominee, but I like that it makes the Academy Awards more accessible to the wider movie-loving public, even if it's being done for largely commercial reasons. As a history buff, I also give the Academy points for their citation of the fact that early Oscars also featured 10 nominees, and even up to 12 nominees in 1934 and 1935.
• Can we just hand the Avatar team the visual effects trophy now?
• I've seen most seven and a half of the Best Picture nominees (I still need to see Precious and An Education, and I have the Hurt Locker at home via Netflix and still have to finish the last hour), and I think it's a fair field with no film coming to mind as a glaring omission. The one that made me raise an eyebrow was The Blind Side, a good but not great movie, but I do have to give it credit for telling an emotional story, and it also features Sandra Bullock's best performance of her career as a southern belle who feels like a real person; it's a performance worthy of that Best Actress nomination.
The Grammys are an interesting creature. They get the biggest stars in the industry to perform, while giving them prizes for songs that have, by this point, largely moved from contemporary stations to adult contemporary stations.
Still, the show manages to deliver a few special moments every year. They started off strong with a fun Lady Gaga performance, including a duet with Elton John.
Lady Gaga & Elton John – "Poker Face," "Speechless"/"Your Song" mashup
Pink also delivered a memorable performance, doing her best Cirque du Soleil impression.
Pink: "Glitter In The Air"
Finally, as a fan of Stephen Colbert, I enjoyed his appearances as he finally won the Grammy after previously being nominated for his audiobook in the spoken word category. He also kicked the show off with an excellent opening monologue:
I'd never seen a Lars Von Trier film before, but I've always been intrigued by the reviews I've read of his films and the soliloquies to his greatness I've heard from my cineaste friends. He's been considered an important director, even by those who don't always like his films. A friend told me earlier this week that "important director" is code for "no one likes their movies."
I had the chance to put this to the test last night, when I watched 1996's Breaking the Waves for the first time. A movie that makes your heart ache. I loved the movie, but it's certainly bleak in a way where it may not be beloved by everyone.
The movie tells the story of a young woman named Bess (Emily Watson) and the love of her life, Jan (Stellan Skarsgard), opening with their wedding in a remote village in Scotland. It's a pure love told in a realistic, moving fashion. Still, the time of joy doesn't last, and at her husband's urging, Bess is sent down a road of debasement that can be hard to watch. She does horrible things, but she does it all for the sake of her love for her husband and her love for God.