Popular now on KPCC
Councilman Paul Krekorian endorses Eric Garcetti for mayor
Mayoral candidate Eric Garcetti picked up the support of San Fernando Valley Councilman Paul Krekorian on Monday.
Krekorian — whose Second Council District is in the East valley — endorsed Garcetti over Wendy Greuel. That's called payback: When Krekorian first ran for CD2, Greuel backed another candidate – Chris Essel. (Greuel represented CD 2 from 2002 to 2009.)
“Right now, more than ever, we need a mayor who will have the courage to deal honestly with the budget challenges we face," said Krekorian, who chairs the Budget and Finance Committee. "We need somebody who's going to think innovatively about new ways to deliver government services."
“As mayor, Eric's going to make sure the San Fernando Valley and all of Los Angeles are the best they can be.”
The Valley is considered a strong base for Greuel. A Los Angeles Times breakdown of the March 5 vote shows the Valley leaned toward Greuel and Republican Kevin James. An exit poll from Loyola Marymount University estimated that 34 percent of Valley voters supported Greuel.
Police union backs Nury Martinez for LA City Council
The union that represents officers with the Los Angeles Police Department endorsed a school board member for an open L.A. City Council seat in the San Fernando Valley Monday.
The Los Angeles Police Protective League backed Nury Martinez, one of six certified candidates for the May 21 primary. The winner, who will likely be selected in a July runoff, will fill a vacancy left by Tony Cardenas’ election to Congress.
“We know that she will work to fully fund public safety, give officers the resources they need and work to put more officers on the street,” said LAPPL President Tyler Izen. “L.A.’s sworn police officers agree that Nury Martinez is a terrific choice to continue the work of many for safer, more secure neighborhoods.”
The endorsement could translate into a financial win for Martinez. The union spent $644,717 in independent expenditures to support its candidates in the March 5 primary.
Maven's Morning Coffee: city attorney's fight for neighborhood councils, pension reform becomes issue in mayor's race, a look at Villaraigosa's legacy on the environment
Good morning, readers. Welcome to the Maven's Morning Coffee -- a listing of the important headlines, news conferences, public meetings and announcements you need to know to fuel up and tackle your day.
The Maven's Morning Coffee is also available as a daily email. Click here to subscribe.
Today is Monday, March 18, and here is what's happening in Los Angeles:
City Attorney Carmen Trutanich is fighting a plan that would require neighborhood councils to pay for their own elections, according to the Daily News. In a letter to the mayor, Trutanich wrote, "I know that you are aware of the line of legal authority that concludes that constitutionally-required activities of government cannot be defunded as to materially impair...their duties."
Wendy Greuel says labor was treated unfairly during last year's pension vote at City Hall, reports the Daily News. Her opponent, Eric Garcetti, vote for the new pension tier, which is expected to save the city $4 billion over 30 years.
Budget committee to host hearing on LA's fiscal challenges
The Los Angeles City Council’s budget committee will host a public hearing on the city’s financial challenges Monday evening as a prelude to the mayor’s budget for the next fiscal year.
City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana and representatives from the police and fire departments will be on hand to answer questions. Unlike in previous years when the Budget and Finance Committee met throughout the city, this will be the only public hearing prior to the release of the budget.
The city had projected a $210 million deficit for next year, though that figure might now be closer to $165 million due to better-than-expected returns on pension investments.
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa must release his budget by April 20. Though he will set the spending priorities, the next mayor – who will be sworn in on the same day the fiscal year starts, July 1 – will implement the approved budget.
Sequestration pain in California? Democrats and Republicans disagree
Just how bad are the across-the-board federal budget cuts of sequestration? It depends on who you ask.
It’s been two weeks since the mandatory cuts to defense and domestic spending were enacted. In a break during a recent session of the House of Representatives, we asked a quartet of lawmakers: Has life as we know it been affected in Congressional districts across Southern California?
"Uh, no," said Republican Congressmen Devin Nunes from Visalia. Fellow Republican Congressman John Campbell of Irvine said he's seen "nothing, really" to indicate the cuts are devastating his district.
You get a different answer from Democrat Alan Lowenthal, whose district includes the joint forces training base in Los Alamitos, which employs many civilians.
"It’s the National Guard, it’s the Army Reserve and they’re devastated by the sequester," Lowenthal said.
He pointed out the civilian employees who run the airfields, including air controllers, are all being furloughed. The furloughs haven’t happened yet, but Lowenthal said the base knows they’re coming.
Fellow Democrat Linda Sanchez said the defense cuts hit her Cerritos district, too: "We’ve already been contacted by several businesses that do subcontracts for defense contractors and they’re not hiring, they’re talking about having to furlough employees."
Campbell said over the past year, when talk of sequestration was still just a threat, he also heard from defense contractors in Orange County, wondering whether their contracts would be renewed.
But Campbell said, at least one of the defense contractors who had expressed concern told him: “You guys got to cut spending, so if I wind up losing this contract, that’s okay. We’ll get by."
Campbell did complain about the President’s decision to shut the White House to public tours, something the Congressman labeled an “abominable move.” He said one Orange County school group of nearly a hundred students and their teachers and parents raised money to come see the Capitol and the White House.
"They saw the Capitol," Campbell said, "they’re not going to be able to see the White House. And that’s really unfortunate and I think that was just frankly, a bonehead move on the part of the President."
Democrats say the domestic cuts are troublesome in other ways as well. Sanchez said she’s received calls from city managers in her district worried about cuts to community development block grants, grants to hire police officers, funding for Section 8 housing and Headstart programs.
Lowenthal said schools are losing a “significant” amount of money. "When you represent large urban districts that really have multiple needs of students," he said, "this is what our districts rely upon and they’re the most vulnerable and going to be the most impacted by sequester."
Nunes, who represents a more rural district, warned it’s just the beginning.
"Everybody knows we have to make cuts," Nunes said. And when you make cuts, there's "absolutely" going to be less government expenditures. "So we have to prioritize."
He added that "all this running around, screaming the sky’s falling" won't solve the larger problem, which he said is entitlements: Medicare and Medicaid.
The President told House Democrats last week to prepare to make concessions on entitlement reform – if Republicans agree to close tax loopholes.
Congresswoman Sanchez said cuts have to be balanced with additional revenue.
"We’re saying when families are in distress, sometimes you have family members that get a second job or a part time job to bring in extra revenue," Sanchez said. She called that "a more balanced approach."
But at least at this point, extra tax revenue is not a bridge Republicans are willing to cross.