How safe are California's bridges?

Bridge Inspection - 1

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Caltrans Senior Bridge Engineer Bing Wu inspects the underbelly of a bridge that's part of Pacific Coast Highway in Manhattan Beach.

Bridge Inspection - 9

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Caltrans spokesman Jim Drago says a good bridge design is functional and doesn't overwhelm the surrounding environment.

Bridge Inspection - 6

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Each bridge in Southern California has an identification number associated with it. Before an inspection, Wu prints out the history of the bridge's previous inspections.

Bridge Inspection - 10

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Senior Bridge Engineer Bing Wu uses a hammer to inspect a crack in the bridge's asphalt. Then he measures how long and deep the hole is.

Bridge Inspection - 11

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

"We look like a doctor looking at a patient," says Bing Wu.

Bridge Inspection - 7

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Drago and Wu write down which issues came to their attention, and measurements of cracks or other problems.

Bridge Inspection - 8

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Wu spray paints circles around small chips in the concrete railing on the Manhattan Beach bridge, to mark them for future repairs.

Bridge Inspection - 13

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Jim Drago and Bing Wu inspect the bottom of the concrete structure. The bridge was widened in 1972.

Bridge Inspection - 4

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

"It's older than I am," says Bing Wu of the bridge, which was built in 1930. The overpass is a typical concrete structure with metal beams.

Bridge Inspection - 2

Maya Sugarman/KPCC

Caltrans' Bing Wu first checks the top of the bridge, including the railing and the road.


When a bridge fell in Washington last month it rekindled questions about the state of our nation's infrastructure.

That span over the Skagit river had been rated both "functionally obsolete" and "fracture critical" prior to collapse. Right now in California there are more than 600 bridges labeled either functionally obsolete, fracture critical or "structurally deficient."

MAP: Click here for an interactive map of Southern California bridges and their various ratings.

Those terms sound scary, but many experts say there's no need to worry.

"The terms functionally obsolete and structurally deficient do not really indicate the condition of the bridge," said Caltrans spokesman Jim Drago.

These are general terms, he explained, used by the federal government as part of a national bridge rating system.

FAQ: How do you know if a bridge is safe?

The structurally deficient rating means that a bridge has a physical flaw of some kind. That could be something serious, but in most cases it's just cracked pavement or peeling paint.

Functionally obsolete means a bridge isn't up to current building standards. That often means the lanes are narrow or there is no shoulder for stalled cars. Sometimes it denotes a more serious structural issue that will force Caltrans to repair or rebuild a structure.

Fracture critical means a bridge doesn't have a secondary support system to stop it from collapsing if it is seriously overloaded, or if it experiences a significant accident that impacts a vulnerable section. Both the bridge in Washington state and the one that fell in Minnesota in 2007 were rated fracture critical.

"This kind of accident is always [a] very small probability thing," said UCLA structural engineering professor Jian Zhang. She maintains these circumstance are very rare, and that a fracture critical label does not necessarily mean a bridge is structurally unsound.

Fot its part, Caltrans says it shuts down any bridge that's deemed unsafe.

The agency recognized that the ominous-sounding federal classifications don't show the true quality of a bridge. So the state developed its own rating system, called the Bridge Health Index.

Rather than giving a general sense of how a bridge is doing, like the federal system does, the Bridge Health Index drills down into specifics. It includes inspection of more than 100 components of a structure, from the columns to the girders to the guard rails. Using this system, Caltrans can not only understand how sturdy a bridge is, but which parts might need work or replacement.

Next year, the federal government plans to enact a similar system.

Still, not everyone is satisfied with this, or with any visual inspection method.

Barry LePatner is a construction lawyer and author of the book Too Big to Fall: America's Failing Infrastructure and the Way Forward. He says the eyes can't see everything happening with a bridge.

"There could be a huge crack on the inside of a multi-ton structural member, except it hasn't become visual yet for three more years," LePatner argued.

In the future he would like to see bridges fitted with sensors that can detect structural problems long before they appear. In fact, some bridges in California already use this kind of system, like the Vincent Thomas Bridge in Long Beach.

For the most part, though, states still rely on human inspectors to gauge the health of a bridge.

More in Local

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus