Diplomats press Syria to give up chemical weapons. What do you think?

In Washington, D.C., this week, there have been demonstrations both in favor of and against a military strike on targets in Syria. Outside the White House on Monday, supporters of Syrian President Bashar Assad waved a Syrian flag with his face on it.

Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images

In Washington, D.C., this week, there have been demonstrations both in favor of and against a military strike on targets in Syria. Outside the White House on Monday, supporters of Syrian President Bashar Assad waved a Syrian flag with his face on it.

Do you think the United States should be taking military action in Syria? Why? Why not? What do you think of these new diplomatic efforts? Join in the conversation in the comments below or on our Facebook page, then join us in the Crawford Family Forum this evening for a live event during which we will watch President Obama's speech, then listen to a panel of experts moderated by AirTalk's Larry Mantle.

France will put a resolution before the U.N. Security Council on Tuesday that calls on Syria to hand over its chemical weapons to international monitors and "accept that they will be dismantled," France 24 reports.

Word about the resolution comes from French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. It follows the dramatic events of Monday, which as NPR's Corey Flintoff explained on Morning Edition, began when Secretary of State John Kerry said Syrian President Bashar Assad might be able to head off a U.S. military strike if he turns over "every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week."

VIDEO: Kerry says Syria deal must be in binding UN resolution

Within hours of Kerry's comment, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov was saying he had urged his Syrian counterpart to do that. Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem then said his nation welcomed the Russian suggestion. Finally, President Obama capped the day by telling U.S. TV networks that he favors a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

RELATED: Watch President Obama's Speech LIVE!

Among the unknowns as the day began: How the French resolution will or won't compare to the idea floated by Lavrov and whether Syria would abide by whatever language — and potential requirements — the French draft.

Now, along with the news about the resolution that France will put before the Security Council — which might win support from Russia and China — there's word from Russia's Interfax news agency that "Syria accepts" the Russian proposal to put its chemical weapons under international control.

The Russian news outlet RT.com reports that, according to Interfax, the Syrian foreign minister said Tuesday that "we accepted Russia's initiative."

The Associated Press quotes the minister as saying Syria hopes its decision will "uproot U.S. aggression."

RELATED: Think you know Syria? Take this quiz to find out

Meanwhile, on CBS This Morning, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona said he is "very skeptical" about reports that Assad's regime has accepted Russia's proposal. "We should be [skeptical]," said McCain, who favors a military response to Assad's alleged use of chemical weapons. "Assad has refused to acknowledge that he even has chemical weapons."

Still, McCain added, perhaps Assad wouldn't even consider accepting such a plan "if it hadn't been for the threat of a military strike."

The Obama administration says intelligence gathered about an attack near Damascus last month indicates that forces loyal to Assad were behind the launching of missiles carrying deadly Sarin gas. The administration says it believes more than 1,400 people were killed and even more were injured.

On Tuesday, the independent organization Human Rights Watch issued a report saying it has concluded that "available evidence strongly suggests that Syrian government forces were responsible."

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

 

More in U.S. / World

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus