Local

Measure M tax increase could cost extra $25 to $65 a person each year

FILE: A cash register shows the purchase of an LCD screen TV. Residents in some L.A. County cities could be paying up to 10.25 percent sales tax on items if a ballot measure to fund transit is approved.
FILE: A cash register shows the purchase of an LCD screen TV. Residents in some L.A. County cities could be paying up to 10.25 percent sales tax on items if a ballot measure to fund transit is approved.
Aranami via Flickr

Listen to story

01:04
Download this story 0.0MB

A proposed countywide sales tax increase to pay for billions of dollars in new rail and highway improvements over coming decades could cost Los Angeles county residents an extra $25 to $65 each per year.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is placing Measure M before L.A. County voters on this year's general election ballot. If approved by a two-thirds majority, the initiative will do two things: extend the existing Measure R half-cent sales tax approved in 2008 and add a new half-cent sales tax.

Both increases would remain in place forever, or until voters act to repeal them.

According to calculations released by Metro, each resident pays about $25 more in taxes each year for every half-cent increase. But economist Christopher Thornberg, the co-founder of Beacon Economics, an independent research and consulting firm, questioned the figure.

"Digging into the statistics and looking a little carefully at the number, $25 doesn’t seem realistic to us," he said.

Metro’s estimate is based on a study from the L.A. Economic Development Corp., which says that only a third of sales taxes paid in L.A. County come from residents; the rest are paid by tourists and businesses.

But Thornberg said that methodology doesn’t take into account those residents who own businesses themselves and how those businesses could pass on their sales taxes to consumers.

"Coming up with what the resident spending is — versus the business spending — is very difficult," he said, noting many businesses are owned and operated by people who live in the county.

He thinks the average cost to residents will be at least $35, and as high as $65 based off recent tax receipts and a survey of average consumer expenditures in L.A. County.

Revenue from Measure M, if approved, would generate $860 million  year or $120 billion over 40 years, Metro estimates. Those figures are based on a UCLA Anderson Forecast tax projection for all sales taxes, paid by residents, businesses and tourists in the fiscal year ending in 2018. It is the largest transit-related ballot initiative on the November ballot nationwide. 

The transportation agency plans to undertake a long list of capital projects, including a subway under the Sepulveda Pass, an extension of the Gold Line to Claremont, an acceleration of the Purple Line subway to Westwood, and major highway improvements. 

Measure M would be the fourth sales tax increase in L.A. County for transportation since the 1980s. If approved, Measure M would bump the base county sales tax rate up to 9.25 percent.

In some cities, which have their own local sales tax add-ons, the rate would be even higher: South Gate, Pico Rivera and La Mirada top the list with a projected rate of 10.25 percent, placing them among the cities with the highest rates in the nation.

 Projected sales tax in select cities if Measure M passes

City New Tax* Income**
     
Pico Rivera 10.25 56,683
La Mirada 10.25 83,514
South Gate 10.25 48,312
Avalon 9.75 53,200
Santa Monica 9.75 69,013
Culver City 9.75 70,774
South El Monte 9.75 46,912
Commerce 9.75 46,245
San Fernando 9.75 54,068
Inglewood 9.75 46,574
El Monte 9.75 44,415
Los Angeles 9.25 53,482

*Current sales tax plus new Measure M half-cent tax. Does not include the Prop. 30 quarter cent sales tax expiring at end of the year
**Average 2014 household income
Source: L.A. County Metro, Census Bureau

"When you get above 10 percent, people start to notice," said Lisa Schweitzer, University of Southern California professor of urban planning. "It comes to a point where people might change their consuming behavior."

But Thornberg, co-founder of Beacon Economics, said there's little evidence that slight adjustments to sales taxes have much of an effect on whether people choose to shop or where. 

"Let's think about what the cost of buying something is," he said. "There are the direct costs — what you actually pay, including the sales tax, and there are the transaction costs — getting to the store getting back, parking, gas all that."

Given a bill that might increase just 50 cents on a $100 purchase, most people would choose not to go out of their way to avoid the tax increase. 

One exception, he said, is car purchases. Thornberg has seen evidence that people will travel far distances to avoid high sales tax rates on a major purchase, although California law dictates that consumers pay sales tax based on the address on their car registration, not the location of the purchase.

In South Gate, one of the cities with the highest sales tax rates in the county, resident Blanca Almendares said in March she hears from some friends who leave to make major purchases but she infrequently does — and she supports paying higher taxes to build better transit.

Sales taxes are considered regressive because poor people end up paying a higher share of their income compared to wealthier people. But many experts say a sales tax to pay for transit is less problematic.

"It's countered by the fact that transit is progressive," said Schweitzer, meaning low-income people use public transit at higher rates.

Still, she worries that continually increasing sales taxes will be hard to reverse. Economist Thornberg sees the problem in a different light.

"A deeper question is why have we limited ourselves to taxing such a small share of overall consumption," he said, noting prices on such services as construction or legal help have shot up much faster than prices on goods like clothes and electronics.

California currently does not charge a sales tax on food or services.

Correction and update: a previous version of this story incorrectly stated the tax increase could cost $25 per household. Metro says the initiative would actually incur an average $25 more in taxes per person in L.A. County. Also, economist Chris Thornberg initially supported Metro's estimate based on recent tax receipts. But after further research, Thornberg said he believes Metro has underestimated the tax burden to consumers by at least $10. He believes the tax increase will cost an extra $35 to $65 per person per year.

To help you fill out your general election ballot, we've gathered the information you need on candidates and measures on KPCC's Voter Game Plan page and in our Voter's Edge voter guide.