When Brute Force Fails
Do you fight crime by leaving some gangs alone? That's one of the arguments put forth by Mark Kleiman, author of "When Brute Force Fails." In the book, the UCLA public policy professor argues that police forces get better results by focusing most energy on the most prolific criminal gangs, and punishing them swiftly, to motivate other potential criminals to stay inactive. Is this the solution?
Web Resources
Also on this episode
AirTalk on the Road
Terror in the Skies---Balancing Privacy and Security
AirTalk goes on the road to the Center for the Preservation of Democracy in Little Tokyo, in partnership with Community Advocates, Inc. Join Larry Mantle and a panel of experts address the constitutional and security issues at stake in securing commercial air travel.
Wed., March 17th, at 7:00 p.m
The event is free and open to the public. RSVP: airtalk@kpcc.org.
Click here for more info
Guest:
Mark Kleiman, author of "When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment." He is a professor of public policy at the University of California in Los Angeles
Comments disabled after 14 days





















4 months, 2 weeks ago
How has the privatization of American prisons had an effect on justice?
4 months, 1 week ago
Finally! Someone says it!
I have been saying for years to friends and family that what was important was swiftness and certainty not severity. I'm glad now that a scholarly work backs up my intuition and reasoning.
Also, this brings up interesting things from a self defense perspective; if many more people fought back against being victimized there would be a lot less victimization.
Anyway, trackback, on this from my blog:
http://docmerlin.blogspot.com/2009/11/in-terms-of-crime-deterrent-from-state.html