Lively and in-depth discussions of city news, politics, science, entertainment, the arts, and more.
Hosted by Larry Mantle
Airs Weekdays 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

High Court watchers profile judges on President Trump’s SCOTUS shortlist




Plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case Jim Obergefell  speaks during a rally urging the U.S. Senate to hold a confirmation vote for Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland.
Plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case Jim Obergefell speaks during a rally urging the U.S. Senate to hold a confirmation vote for Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland.
Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Listen to story

14:32
Download this story 6.0MB

It’s been almost a year since the death of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and since then the High Court has ruled on several cases with only eight justices, leading to a number of 4-4 ties and ultimately little to no resolution to the cases at hand.

Now that President Trump has officially taken office, he’s made one of his first priorities filling the vacant spot on the bench. Trump tweeted on Wednesday that he’d announce his nominee next week. A list of finalists has been making its rounds on the Internet and via the media and three main contenders have emerged: Judge Neil Gorsuch of Colorado, Judge William Pryor of Alabama, and Judge Thomas Hardimann of Pennsylvania.

We’ll dive into the backgrounds of these contenders and others on the shortlist, plus talk about what each might bring to the bench if appointed and confirmed.

Guests:

Amy Howe, author of ‘Howe on the Court,’ a blog covering the Supreme Court and the Judiciary; she is a reporter and former editor for SCOTUSblog and continues to contract as a reporter for them

Margaret Russell, professor of law at Santa Clara University