Patt Morrison

<em>Patt Morrison</em> is known for its innovative discussions of local politics and culture, as well as its presentation of the effects of national and world news on Southern California. Hosted by

Is art only for the elite?

by Patt Morrison

2453 full
Atmosphere at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion after a performance by the Los Angeles Opera. Amanda Edwards/Getty Images

A new report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy raises some important questions about the way we fund the arts.

Traditionally, foundations give billions to elite and well-established institutions, like the symphony and major museums that serve a mostly affluent, white audience. This funding model continues despite the fact that the audience for those institutions is declining. The research shows that big budget arts organizations collect about 55 percent of foundation funding even though they represent “only 2 percent of the nonprofit arts and culture sector.” By contrast, about 10 percent goes to fund arts programs in underserved and poor communities.

The goal isn’t to withhold funding from some of our nation’s most prestigious art institutions says the author, but rather to share the wealth. The study warns that without a more equitable distribution of resources, a “pronounced imbalance restricts the expressive life of millions of people.”

WEIGH IN:

Should we expand our support and understanding of what art is, where it comes from and where it’s going? Do major foundations have an obligation to support artistic diversity found in less traditional places? Or is there some value in being a “starving artist"?

Guests:



Aaron Dorfman, executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy

Maurine Knighton, leads the arts and culture programs for the Nathan Cummings Foundation

blog comments powered by Disqus

Enjoy The Frame? Try KPCC’s other programs.

What's popular now on KPCC