Lively and in-depth discussions of city news, politics, science, entertainment, the arts, and more.
Hosted by Larry Mantle
Airs Weekdays 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

Attorneys argue the case for, against President Obama’s executive action on immigration




The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to an election-year review of Obama's executive order to allow up to 5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally to work legally in the United States.
The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to an election-year review of Obama's executive order to allow up to 5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally to work legally in the United States.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Listen to story

08:35
Download this story 4MB

(Mark Sherman | AP) The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to an election-year review of President Barack Obama's executive order to allow up to 5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally to "come out of the shadows" and work legally in the United States.

The justices said they will consider undoing lower court orders that blocked the plan from taking effect in the midst of a presidential campaign that already roiled by the issue.

The case, United States v. Texas will be argued in April and decided by late June, about a month before both parties' gather for their nominating conventions. The immigrants who would benefit from the administration's plan are mainly the parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. Texas is leading 26 mainly Republican-dominated states in challenging the Democratic administration's immigration plan.

What factors will justices be considering in this hearing? What impact will this ruling have on the 2016 election?

Read more on this story here.

Guests:

Karen Tumlin, managing attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, which filed an amicus brief

Dan Stein,  President of Federation for American Immigration Reform, a DC-based nonprofit working to tighten immigration. The group has filed an amicus brief in support of the state of Texas