Prop 8, the “Limits on Dialysis Clinics' Revenue and Required Refunds Initiative,” proposes clinics that administer life-saving kidney dialysis treatments be required to refund patients and insurance companies a certain percentage of their revenue.
Any profit over 15% that is not spent directly improve patient-care would be returned to the payer at the end of the fiscal year under penalty of fine. Prop 8 was put forth by the Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers West (UHW-West) which is also in the process of an organizing campaign targeting two major dialysis clinics. The union has been accused of advancing the legislation as a bargaining tactic.
Supporters say Prop 8 will encourage clinics to apply profits to improvements that result in bettering patient care (facilities, equipment, wages) to dissuade overcharging for critical treatment, increase the quality of patient care, and push overall cost related to the patient care down. Opponents, which include the California Medical Association, say the limits restrict what insurance companies have to pay for treatment and will force clinics to close, therefor restricting access to life saving treatment.
Ready for Election Day? Get up to speed on what you need to know with our Voter Game Plan at elections.laist.com. Read up on the candidates and ballot measures, find out about registration deadlines or ask us your questions.
DeWayne Cox, a dialysis patient, who represents the “No on Prop 8” coalition