At 89 years old, James Ivory's screenplay for “Call Me By Your Name" has brought renewed interest in this filmmaker whose career spans decades.
Directed by Luca Guadagnino, "Call Me By Your Name" tells the story of a summer romance between a teenage boy named Elio, played by Timothee Chalamet, and Oliver, a grad student played by Armie Hammer.
It's not the first gay love story Ivory has told on screen. That was his 1987 film “Maurice” based on an E.M. Forster novel starring Hugh Grant and James Wilby.
Together with his longtime collaborators – producer Ismail Merchant and screenwriter Ruth Prawer Jhabvala – Ivory brought many beloved books to the screen. They famously clashed with Harvey Weinstein over the edit of their 2000 film “The Golden Bowl."
Ivory has also earned three Academy Award nominations for directing the films "A Room With a View," "Howard's End" and "The Remains of the Day." But he has yet to win an Oscar.
When James Ivory spoke with John Horn about his work on "Call Me By Your Name" he stressed the importance of the relationship that the Elio character had with his parents who were utterly accepting of their son's sexuality.
Below are some highlights from that conversation including his thoughts on what transpired with Weinstein and "The Golden Bowl."
On his desire to have both of the parents in "Call Me By Your Name" accept their son's sexuality:
Of course the father speaks as a very wise parent and not someone bound up with all kinds of morality and religion and so forth. But just a person who was willing to accept what life brings and look at it in the best possible way. Today you wouldn't be surprised if one of your parents suddenly decided that they were going to change sex and get married to someone else and all that sort of thing. It happens every day practically. But in the 1980s, that was not true. In the 1980s — and it's just about that time that the story is set — there was the beginning of the AIDS crisis and epidemic.
On why he felt it was important that the final scene between Elio and his father go on so long:
...the scene between the father and the son at the end of the film when the son comes back sad after seeing Oliver go and then the father talks to the son in a very long scene. Much longer than you normally have at the end of a movie. Usually at the end of a movie, if you have two characters who go on for a good ten minutes in dialogue, that's not something you normally do. That would be a fatal kind of thing to do at the end of the film. In this case however, I felt we needed all of that, and we ought to have it and the story needed it.
On how that scene was wish-fulfillment:
I could never have a conversation like that with my father. My father could never, ever... being of the generation — he was born in 1892 — he was of a generation that could not speak of emotional things at all. It was impossible. If he tried to, he would tear up. Today, parents can speak about practically anything.
On his clash with Harvey Weinstein about his 2000 film "The Golden Bowl:"
We bought it back. It was the craziest thing we ever did in our entire career. We bought it back for $4 million. It almost broke us. And yeah, he wanted to do all sorts of things to it and make all kinds of cuts. We weren't going to do those things that he wanted us to do. He said, All right, I'll release it but we'll release it straight to television. We won't play it in theaters. We said, Well, we'll buy it back in that case, which we did.
On a previous clash with Weinstein where Paul Newman stepped in:
Before that, we'd made two films with him. "Mr. & Mrs. Bridge." And he was trying to bully us on that. But there we had a powerful ally who was Paul Newman. Paul Newman said, I'm gonna do press for the film that Jim, Ruth and Ismail made, and not for some other thing.